Sorry Della as I feared you completely misunderstand my comment.
I am not saying that you don’t have SS primary secondary or any other fantasy the rheumatologists care to invent.
I said there is no definitive test for Sjogrens and many MILLIONS OF PEOPLE worldwide are misdiagnosed as not having SS because the medical profeassion in USA and UK have a convention that you can only be diagnosed as SS IF YOU HAVE 3 OUT OF 4 OF THE FOLLOWING AND AT LEAST 1 of ITEMS 3OR4. Some other ountries have a different convention!!!
1 xerostomia as identified by a dental professional/oral/maxillary surgeon ideally with stimulated and non stimulated salivary flow measurements.
2 xeropthalmia schirmers test 5mm or less by opthalmic consultant
3 anti rh/ro/la antibodies - any one of these
4 positive lip biopsy as determined by focal scoring (some institutes accept ultrasound scan on salivary gands evidence but the international convention does not.
MANY _ BETWEEN 40% AND 60% OF US DO NOT HAVE ITEMS 3 OR 4 POSITIVE THEREFORE THE RHEUMATOLOGISTS REFUSE TO ACCEPT THEY HAVE SS _ THIS IS BUNKUM BECAUSE BOTH THE TEST AND CONVENTION ARE FLAWED!!!
I will post elsewhere the evidence for this if you want to raed the scientifi research papers and not just Google headlines or media sound bites.
There is massive controversy in this field andy many consultants including rheumatologists refuse to accept the convention and diagnose clinically using their own judgement.
My comments were not aimed at you personally but as a scientist with a medical post grad degree I only want to publish the truth and not mislead forum members especially new ones who have no bakground as yet of knowledge.
I contradicted yourcart blanche statement that
1 there is a test for SS - THERE IS NOT
2 positive anti ro/la DO NOT CONFIRM ANY DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY OR SECONDARY SJOGREN’S (EVEN IS THERE IS SUCH A DIFFERENCE WHIH IS HIGHLY DEBATABLE - NOT JUST MY OPINION BUT THAT OF MANY SENIOR CONSULTANTS)
FURTHER HAVING POSITIVE ANTI RO/LA (ssa/ssb AS YOU CALL THEM IS NOT SOLELY INDICATIVE OF SJOGREN’S INDEED THEY ARE MORE OFTEN POSITIVE IN S.L.E and R.A.
Please read my first comment again - I was not and do not doubt that you have SS and like all of us are suffering and I feel for you as I do for any one with this disgusting disease.
But I could not let the incorrect scientific comments stand uncorrected as they will mislead anyone who hasn’t researched the thousands of papers out there and can evalauate their veracity.
Just because it is published and even peer reviewed does not mean that it is true.
All scientific papers should be read with healthy scepticism and the result evaluated, the stats tests evaluated and the whether the report comclusions actually reflect their own results -all too often they don’t.
My comment about condescension was beacause I was contradicting your medical/scientific opinion not your disease or sincerity.
Please accept my humble apologies if I upset you - nothing was personal - I just get frustrated when statements are given as “truths” without scientific support especially when the audience may not have the ability/knowledge/training etc to evaluate for themselves.
BEST WISHES TO YOU AND ALL SS SUFFERERS EVERYWHERE - I joined this forum to get support, to learn ( I have leared from many posts -particularlymby KAZ, DRYGUY and SK as they reference their comments) and to offer support especially the scientific ability to criticise the many items out there which are untrue or based on very weak evidence. I promise that as sooon as I find any treatment or research on this subject that stacks up and is helpful I will shout it out loud from the rooftops and in this forum first.